老虎机稳赢方法

“The truth is, everyone likes to look down on someone. If your favorites are all avant-garde writers who throw in Sanskrit and German, you can look down on everyone. If your favorites are all Oprah Book Club books, you can at least look down on mystery readers. Mystery readers have sci-fi readers. Sci-fi can look down on fantasy. And yes, fantasy readers have their own snobbishness. I鈥檒l bet this, though: in a hundred years, people will be writing a lot more dissertations on Harry Potter than on John Updike. Look, Charles Dickens wrote popular fiction. Shakespeare wrote popular fiction鈥攗ntil he wrote his sonnets, desperate to show the literati of his day that he was real artist. Edgar Allan Poe tied himself in knots because no one realized he was a genius. The core of the problem is how we want to define 鈥渓iterature鈥�. The Latin root simply means 鈥渓etters鈥�. Those letters are either delivered鈥攖hey connect with an audience鈥攐r they don鈥檛. For some, that audience is a few thousand college professors and some critics. For others, its twenty million women desperate for romance in their lives. Those connections happen because the books successfully communicate something real about the human experience. Sure, there are trashy books that do really well, but that鈥檚 because there are trashy facets of humanity. What people value in their books鈥攁nd thus what they count as literature鈥攔eally tells you more about them than it does about the book.”
― Brent weeks