ÀÏ»¢»úÎÈÓ®·½·¨

David Sklansky

David Sklansky’s Followers (51)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

David Sklansky


Born
Teaneck, The United States
Genre


Sklansky was born and raised in Teaneck, New Jersey, where he graduated from Teaneck High School in 1966.[2] He attended the University of Pennsylvania, but left before graduation. He returned to Teaneck and passed multiple Society of Actuaries exams by the time he was 20, and worked for an actuarial firm.[3]

Sklansky is generally considered[by whom?] a top authority on gambling. He has written many books on poker, blackjack, and general gambling.

Sklansky has won three World Series of Poker bracelets, two in 1982 ($800 Mixed Doubles, and $1000 Draw Hi) and one in 1983 ($1000 Limit Omaha Hi). He also won the Poker By The Book invitational event on the 2004 World Poker Tour, outlasting Phil Hellmuth Jr, Mike Caro, T. J. Cloutier, and Mike Sext
...more

Average rating: 3.95 · 8,860 ratings · 328 reviews · 70 distinct works • Similar authors
The Theory of Poker: A Prof...

4.03 avg rating — 2,730 ratings — published 1983 — 15 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Hold'Em Poker for Advanced ...

by
3.86 avg rating — 871 ratings — published 1987 — 10 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
No Limit Hold 'em: Theory a...

by
4.04 avg rating — 651 ratings — published 2006 — 8 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Tournament Poker for Advanc...

3.71 avg rating — 447 ratings — published 2002 — 7 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Hold 'em Poker

3.64 avg rating — 357 ratings — published 1976 — 12 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Seven-Card Stud for Advance...

by
3.98 avg rating — 120 ratings — published 1989 — 6 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
DUCY? Exploits, Advice, and...

by
3.63 avg rating — 107 ratings — published 2010 — 3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Getting the Best of It (Skl...

3.96 avg rating — 77 ratings — published 1997 — 8 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Sklansky on Poker (Sklansky...

3.90 avg rating — 68 ratings — published 1993 — 14 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Fighting Fuzzy Thinking in ...

by
3.71 avg rating — 49 ratings — published 1996 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by David Sklansky…
Quotes by David Sklansky  (?)
Quotes are added by the ÀÏ»¢»úÎÈÓ®·½·¨ community and are not verified by ÀÏ»¢»úÎÈÓ®·½·¨.

“To repeat, all poker starts as a struggle for the ante. This struggle for the antes is what determines all future action. It is a struggle that increases and builds up, but it should never be forgotten that the initial struggle for the antes is what started the war. Players who do forget this, no matter how well they play otherwise, frequently find themselves in trouble. Most often they play too many hands in relation to the size of the ante; sometimes they play too few. The best way to evaluate the size of the ante is to think about it in terms of pot odds and expectation. Let’s say you sit down in an eight-handed $10-$20 game, and everybody antes $1. That creates an $8 pot. Starting with that $8, you should play your hand in terms of the odds you’re getting for each bet in relation to your expectation of winning. If you bet $10, you are laying $10 to win $8. If someone calls you, he is getting $18-to-$10. The fact that $1 or one-eighth of that ante money was originally yours is of no consequence. In truth, it is no longer yours. The moment you place your $1 ante in the pot, it belongs to the pot, not to you, and eventually to the winner of the hand. It is a common fallacy for players to think in terms of the money they have already put in the pot. They make a bad call because they called one or two bets on earlier rounds. However, it is absolutely irrelevant whether you put the money in there or someone else did. It is the total amount, no part of which belongs to you any longer, that should determine how you play your hand. In home games the dealer often antes for everybody. Some players play much more loosely when they are dealing, thinking that the ante is somehow theirs. But to play differently just because you anted, rather than someone else, is absurd. It is the same amount of money out there, no matter from whose stack of chips it came. On the other hand, when you have the blind in hold ’em, for example, you can and should play a little looser, not because that blind is yours, but because you’re getting better pot odds.”
David Sklansky, The Theory of Poker: A Professional Poker Player Teaches You How To Think Like One

“The size of the ante in a particular game determines how you play. The larger the ante in comparison to later bets, the more hands you should play.”
David Sklansky, The Theory of Poker: A Professional Poker Player Teaches You How To Think Like One

“$31. Meanwhile the One horse on top of the Four horse is paying $82 and the Two horse on top of the Four horse is paying $157, and it is going like this in most of the other combinations involving horse One and horse Two. Then, clearly, horse One is favored over horse Two in the exacta pool. But if horse Two is going off at lower odds in the win pool than horse One, something is out of kilter. You have found a discrepancy and may have a good exacta bet on horse Two (or a good win bet”
David Sklansky, How to Make $100,000 a Year Gambling for a Living



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite David to ÀÏ»¢»úÎÈÓ®·½·¨.