In recent decades cognitive science has revolutionised our understanding of the workings of the human mind. Philosophy has made a major contribution to cognitive science and has itself been hugely influenced by its development. This dynamic book explores the philosophical significance of cognitive science and examines the central debates that have enlivened its history.
In a wide-ranging and comprehensive account of the topic, philosopher M.J. Cain discusses the historical origins of cognitive science and its philosophical underpinnings; the nature and role of representations in cognition; the architecture of the mind and the modularity thesis; the nature of concepts; knowledge of language and its acquisition; perception; and the relationship between the brain and cognition.
Cain draws upon an extensive knowledge of empirical developments and their philosophical interpretation. He argues that although the field has generated some challenging new views in recent years, many of the core ideas that initiated its birth are still to be taken seriously.
Clearly written and incisively argued, The Philosophy of Cognitive Science will appeal to any student or researcher interested in the workings of the mind.
Read for a class in Philosophy of Cognitive Science. While it's a serviceable introduction to the philosophical aspects of Cognitive Science, Cain doesn't seem to know if he's writing a textbook or a paper, and so offers his own opinion a little too much for it to be an impartial coverage of the subject. Instead I recommend Bermúdez' "Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Science of the Mind", which actually does a great job of introducing the philosophy of cognitive science alongside more empirical results.
به نظرم کتاب خوبی برای شروع و ورود به مباحث مربوط به علوم شناختی بود. ترجمه به نسبت خوب بود، اما مفاهیم بعضا جای توضیح بیشتری داشت و بعضا باید چندباره میخوندم. "بازنماییها"خیلی خوب برام جا نیفتاد و احتمالا باید از یه دانای بحث بپرسم.
کتاب قابل استناد و خوشخوانی برای آشنایی با علوم شناختی است. برخی قسمت ها سنگین میشه اما ترجمه روان و جذابیت موشوع ادامه دادنش رو هموار میکنه. کتاب به خوبی آنچه که در علوم شناختی در جریان بوده و هست را خلاصه میکنه و نگارنده نظر خودش رو هم با جسارت اعلام میکنه. با این حال کتاب بیشتر درباره علوم شناختی است تا درباره فلسفه علوم شناختی؛ به عبارتی مطالب از دیدگاه یک دانشمند علوم شناختی عرضه میشه تا از دیدگاه یک فیلسوفی که دغدغه متافیزیکی داره.