老虎机稳赢方法

“I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you're being had.

Let's be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.

There is no such thing as consensus science. If it's consensus, it isn't science. If it's science, it isn't consensus. Period.”
― Michael Crichton

“I would remind you to notice where the claim of consensus is invoked. Consensus is invoked only in situations where the science is not solid enough. Nobody says the consensus of scientists agrees that E=mc2. Nobody says the consensus is that the sun is 93 million miles away. It would never occur to anyone to speak that way.”
― Michael Crichton

“Most of the time, we see only what we want to see, or what others tell us to see, instead of really investigate to see what is really there. We embrace illusions only because we are presented with the illusion that they are embraced by the majority. When in truth, they only become popular because they are pounded at us by the media with such an intensity and high level of repetition that its mere force disguises lies and truths. And like obedient schoolchildren, we do not question their validity and swallow everything up like medicine. Why? Because since the earliest days of our youth, we have been conditioned to accept that the direction of the herd, and authority anywhere 鈥� is always right.”
― Suzy Kassem, Rise Up and Salute the Sun: The Writings of Suzy Kassem

“The theory of phlogiston was an inversion of the true nature of combustion. Removing phlogiston was in reality adding oxygen, while adding phlogiston was actually removing oxygen. The theory was a total misrepresentation of reality. Phlogiston did not even exist, and yet its existence was firmly believed and the theory adhered to rigidly for nearly one hundred years throughout the eighteenth century. ... As experimentation continued the properties of phlogiston became more bizarre and contradictory. But instead of questioning the existence of this mysterious substance it was made to serve more comprehensive purposes. ... For the skeptic or indeed to anyone prepared to step out of the circle of Darwinian belief, it is not hard to find inversions of common sense in modern evolutionary thought which are strikingly reminiscent of the mental gymnastics of the phlogiston chemists or the medieval astronomers.

To the skeptic, the proposition that the genetic programmes of higher organisms, consisting of something close to a thousand million bits of information, equivalent to the sequence of letters in a small library of one thousand volumes, containing in encoded form countless thousands of intricate algorithms controlling, specifying and ordering the growth and development of billions and billions of cells into the form of a complex organism, were composed by a purely random process is simply an affront to reason. But to the Darwinist the idea is accepted without a ripple of doubt - the paradigm takes precedence!”
― Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis

“Majority wins, but majority is not necessarily right and sometimes majority is awfully wrong.”
― Amit Kalantri

“When I was ten years old, one of my friends brought a Shaleenian kangaroo-cat to school one day. I remember the way it hopped around with quick, nervous leaps, peering at everything with its large, almost circular golden eyes.

One of the girls asked if it was a boy cat or a girl cat. Our instructor didn't know; neither did the boy who had brought it; but the teacher made the mistake of asking, 'How can we find out?' Someone piped up, 'We can vote on it!' The rest of the class chimed in with instant agreement and before I could voice my objection that some things can't be voted on, the election was held. It was decided that the Shaleenian kangaroo-cat was a boy, and forthwith, it was named Davy Crockett.

Three months later, Davy Crockett had kittens. So much for democracy.

It seems to me that if the electoral process can be so wrong about such a simple thing, isn't it possible for it to be very, very wrong on much more complex matters? We have this sacred cow in our society that what the majority of people want is right鈥攂ut is it?

Our populace can't really be informed, not the majority of them鈥攎ost people vote the way they have been manipulated and by the way they have responded to that manipulation鈥攖hey are working out their own patterns of wishful thinking on the social environment in which they live.

It is most disturbing to me to realize that though a majority may choose a specific course of action or direction for itself, through the workings of a 'representative government,' they may be as mistaken about the correctness of such a choice as my classmates were about the sex of that Shaleenian kangaroo-cat.

I'm not so sure than an electoral government is necessarily the best.”
― David Gerrold, Star Hunt

“The truth does not need a number of supporters for authenticity. One person among the lot can be the only truthful out of the ten; 11 people out of 12 may be on the truthful side. However, the truth is the truth irrespective of how many people like to embrace it!”
― Israelmore Ayivor, The Great Hand Book of Quotes

“The majority is by no means omniscient just because it is the majority. In fact, I've found that the line which divides majority opinion from mass hysteria is often so fine as to be virtually invisible.”
― J. Paul Getty, How to Be Rich

“But what good is the popular opinion, if the lot of us just process like minions?”
― Criss Jami, Healology

“In 1967, only 4% of Americans approved of interracial marriage, yet the Supreme Court dismissed the desire of 96% of Americans who did not support it in order to preserve the rights of the minority.”
― Kathy Baldock, Walking the Bridgeless Canyon: Repairing the Breach Between the Church and the LGBT Community

“There is nothing uglier than an unrighteous and foolish majority!”
― Mehmet Murat ildan

“We must dilute and disperse all forms of concentrated power that refuse to be accountable to majority wishes.”
― Bryant McGill, Voice of Reason

“Just because there are many loud voices doesn鈥檛 mean that what they鈥檙e saying is right.”
― Charles F Glassman

“袥褞斜芯谐芯 褋泻芯谢褜泻芯-薪懈斜褍写褜 蟹薪邪褔懈屑芯谐芯 褔械谢芯胁械泻邪 褏芯褌褜 褉邪蟹 胁 卸懈蟹薪懈 写邪 锌芯褌褉邪胁懈谢懈. 袝褋谢懈 褝褌芯谐芯 芯锌褘褌邪 薪械褌, 薪褍 锌褉芯褋褌芯 胁褘 褋邪屑懈 泻 薪械屑褍 胁薪褍褌褉械薪薪械 谐芯褌芯胁褘 褌芯谐写邪, 褌芯谐写邪 胁褘 褋邪屑懈 锌褉械胁褉邪褖邪械褌械褋褜 胁 褌褉邪胁懈褌械谢褟. 携 锌芯谢褍褔懈谢 褋褌芯泄泻芯械 锌褉芯褌懈胁芯褟写懈械. 袝褋谢懈 斜 胁芯褌 薪械 褝褌芯褌 芯锌褘褌 褕泻芯谢褜薪芯谐芯 懈蟹谐芯泄褋褌胁邪, 褟 斜褘 芯褔械薪褜 芯褏芯褌薪芯 锌褉懈屑褘泻邪谢 泻 谢褞斜芯屑褍 斜芯谢褜褕懈薪褋褌胁褍. 袩芯薪懈屑邪械褌械, 胁芯褌 "袣褉褘屑 - 薪邪褕" - 褝褌芯 褌邪泻 褋芯斜谢邪蟹薪懈褌械谢褜薪芯... 邪 褍 屑械薪褟 - 锌褉懈胁懈胁泻邪!”
― 袛屑懈褌褉懈泄 袘褘泻芯胁